5 best books about flying

A few people commented on my reference to the Cannibal Queen book in a recent post about my favourite aeroplanes and asked what other books about flying I like. Apart from my (very) early years reading ‘Biggles’ books, I have read only a few really good books about flying. Here is a list of five of the best, in no particular order. Having already mentioned the Cannibal Queen, although it is a favourite, I have not included it in the list.

The Wild Blue Yonder – Book of Aviation.
Wild Blue YonderThis is a non-fictional account of aviation in the 20th century, originally published in 1997. Allowing for the almost 20 years since its publication, this is an still an engrossing account of flying and aeroplanes – from the early pioneers like Saint-Exupéry and Markham and their lonely solo flights through to breaking the sound barrier with Chuck Yeager and many before, after and in between. Even including Biggles! It’s not a cheap book at over A$75 (if you can find a new one) but is completely absorbing and a marvellous compilation which you can dip into time and again and still find something new. Searching the usual book websites will turn up secondhand copies of varying qualities from as little as A$5 but make sure you know who you’re ordering from before leaping to buy!


Wind, Sand and Stars
by Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
Wind sand stars
Against a backdrop of flying the mail routes in the Sahara and South American Andes, Saint-Exupéry writes of friendship, death and heroism. The book describes his exploits and, in particular, his near fatal accident in the Sahara Desert, when he and his navigator/engineer almost died of thirst and dehydration after surviving the initial crash. The book was originally published in French in 1939 but was soon translated into English – and, shortly afterwards, significantly changed, as the author felt some of the content was not appropriate for its USA readers. In French, the book was titled ‘Terre des hommes’ (‘Land of men’) with the English ‘Wind, Sand and Stars’ suggested by the translator. Although the translation is many years old, the book is still a good read, telling of times when aviation was still an extremely risky business.


Zero 3 Bravo
by Mariana Gosnell
Zero three bravoAnother non-fictional account of flying across the USA in a small aeroplane – this time a 1950 Luscombe Silvaire (registered Zero 3 Bravo of the title), which, to the uninitiated, is a 2-seat metal high wing aircraft with a cruise speed of about 85 knots. This is the true story of 60 years-old Mariana Gosnell, who set out in the early 1990’s for a three-month trip from New York across the USA to the west coast and then back again. It recounts her experiences of the people she met along the way and is well-illustrated with photos she took. It’s one of those books that are very enjoyable and easy to read – the only downside (if you’d call it that) is that it will start you dreaming of (even planning) your own trip! Highly recommended.

The Spirit of St Louis by Charles Lindbergh
Spirit of St LouisI suppose no collection of aviation books would be complete without the amazing tale of the first solo flight across the Atlantic Ocean in a single-engined aeroplane. This is the book, written by Lindbergh, which was published many years – in fact over 25 years – after his epic flight. It won the Pulitzer Prize in 1954, the year after its publication. Apart from covering the flight itself, the book also describes in detail the preparation and planning for the flight and, in particular, overcoming the almost insurmountable problem of building an aircraft with enough speed, yet still able to carry a pilot and enough fuel for the journey. In the end, the aeroplane was filled with over 450 US gallons of fuel (that’s over 1,700 litres) and just about managed to take off at almost half a ton overweight – that’s a lot for a small single engine plane. How Lindbergh stayed awake during his long solitary night flight towards Europe is recounted so well, you could almost be there yourself. New copies of the book can still be found with a little digging – it was reprinted at least in 2003. Here’s a link to s short video, with subtitled commentary on the take off: ‘Well then I might as well go’

Propellerhead by Antony Woodhead
PropellerheadLast but not least is this funny, charming, part fiction, part autobiographical tale, of a young man and his friend (only one of whom knew how to fly) who decide that owning an aircraft will make them chick magnets (his words, not mine). So they set out to buy a microlight/ultralight in the form of a tube, fabric and wire ‘Thruster’ aircraft – described as a flying lawn mower with two plastic chairs. Along the way, he learns about and makes lists of all the various microlighting paraphernalia and in particular, falls in love – not with a lovely young damsel – but with being up in the air and the sheer joy of flight. Captivatingly amateur in its approach, this is at the root of the book’s appeal, along with all the views of the world common to young men. In a way, it’s a ‘coming of age’ story which is well-told and, in parts, hilarious along the way.

Happy reading!

PS – have you any aviation good reads?

My top 10 aeroplanes – part 1

I’m sometimes asked: ‘If money was no object, what aeroplane would you buy?’ Realistically and unfortunately, money is an obstacle to both buying and running an aeroplane, so I’d have to rule out things like the impressive 4-seat Cirrus and lovely old warbirds like P51 Mustangs and Harvards. And anyway, even if I could afford them, I likely wouldn’t be buying one because there are plenty of other aeroplanes which tick my boxes, get my blood flowing and cost considerably less. Mostly.

The following list (part 1) is in no particular preference order and if you asked me a year ago or in a year’s time, I’d probably give a different answer.

Vans RV-7

Vans RV-7

Two-seater with a high cruise speed – Vans RV-7
The Vans range of kit aircraft is now almost legendary – not only for its sheer production numbers but also for the delightful handling characteristics of every single aircraft in the range. For me, the RV-7 is the pick of the bunch, with two comfortable, side-by-side seats and a true cruise speed in the 160-180 knots range. In standard configuration, it will carry a reasonable amount of fuel and, if fitted with an auto-pilot and auxiliary fuel tanks, it really is possible to cross Australia in a day. The only drawback is that you either have to build it yourself or wait for someone to sell you a ready-built one. If you’re buying ready-built, look out for shonky metal work, which may be evidence of haste and cost-cutting in areas hidden from view.

 

Aerolite 103

Aerolite 103

Open air single seater – Aerolite 103
Right at the other end of the scale is this nice little single seat ultralight/Part 103 aircraft from Aerolite – now also available in Europe as the Aerolite 120 (a reference to the kilos empty weight limit of the aircraft). I have always been a fan of open air ultralights, in spite of an early nasty experience with an infamous UK-built aircraft called the Southern Aero Sports Scorpion, which gained the dubious honour of becoming the first ever ultralight to be grounded by the UK CAA due to a series of unexplained in-flight structural failures. In complete contrast, the Aerolite design is tried and trusted and many of them have been sold world-wide. Unfortunately these factory built aircraft cannot legally be registered in Australia or I would probably get one. They are inexpensive, great fun (on a calm day) and can be folded to fit in your garage or hangar.

 

J-3 Cub

J-3 Cub

Antique – Piper J3 Cub
This is a perennial favourite, with many thousands built in the 1940’s, 1950’s and 1960’s. Although flown from the back seat, the J3 set the standard for easy-to-fly taildraggers and many a (bush) pilot learned to fly in one. A nicely restored version can fetch several tens of thousands of dollars but a good honest aircraft with plenty of engine time remaining can be found for under $30,000. One of my favourite videos is Lainey’s First Flight of a youngster of about the same age as my grandchildren enjoying a flight with her Dad in a J3. Click here for the excellent Wikipedia entry for the Cub.

 

Cessna 180

Cessna 180

Load carrier – Cessna 180/185
The Cessna 180/185 truly has become a legend in its own time. Legendary for its ability to lift heavy loads out of short airstrips and cruise at a reasonable speed. Although still subject to all the potentially expensive SIDS requirements, the 180/185 series are amazingly rugged aircraft and have accumulated a vast range of TSO’d options and modifications from STOL wing kits (which change the wing aero profile and add ‘fences’) to strengthened landing gear and brakes. Recently a customer arrived at Tyabb in his 185 to collect some parts to repair a Foxbat – click here to see a photo of what he fitted inside the aircraft.

 

Boeing Stearman

Boeing Stearman

Biplane – Boeing Stearman
A few years ago, my father-in-law gave me a book called ‘The Cannibal Queen’. This is a non-fictional story, by thriller writer Stephen Coonts, recounting his 1991 exploits in the yellow Boeing Stearman of the title. He set off to land the aircraft at least once in every one of the 48 mainland states of America. He tells of FBOs (Fixed Base Operators) in the middle of nowhere providing him with a pick-up truck to get into town, in exchange for buying a tank full of fuel. He describes each and every one of his landings, some of which were ‘not so good’ and some of which were ‘terrible’. He says the Stearman always had control and it was down to a whim whether she (the Cannibal Queen) was in a good mood and would let him down gently. I love the look of the Stearman – when you get up to it, it is a big aircraft. In lower horse-power models, it was used as a primary trainer for the military. The higher power versions – 450 hp and up – make excellent aerobatic aircraft, although they are somewhat more difficult to fly. Some people (I think wrongly) compare the Stearman much more favourably with the UK Tiger Moth which, they allege, was not a good trainer. Whatever, I love the sound of those big lazy radial engines, even if they do gulp the fuel.

More favourites in Part 2

Critters Lodge Fly-in 2015

Critters CreekAnother video – this time of the Critters Lodge Fly-in early May 2015. Critters Lodge is at Dillard Ranch Airfield east of Centerville in Texas. Lovely weather and great use of a hi-resolution camera mounted on a drone. Cold Play fans will like the music – ‘Sky Full of Stars’. What a great way to spend a weekend.

Click here or on the photo for the link.

Sun ‘n Fun & LSAs

Andrew’s Foxbat – photo courtesy Mick Worthington

The following ‘comment’ was submitted by Andrew Murray – Foxbat owner in Western Australia – in response to my recent blog post about ‘Light Sport Aircraft – which is best?’. I think it is of enough interest to publish it as an item in its own right – thank you Andrew!

I am just back from Sun ‘n Fun in the US where I had the opportunity to inspect almost all of the latest offerings in the LSA (and also light GA aircraft) arena. I was also tickled pink to meet and speak with Yuriy Yakovlyev, designer of my cherished Foxbat of course !

It was great fun to look at all the aircraft now available and dream of having a stable of them to suit every whim. It would be a “stable” because, as you point out, everything is a compromise and nothing does everything. Choosing an LSA is, I think, a matter of choosing the “right” compromise. By this I mean the one that suits one’s own flying profile but also one that makes a good balance between the fundamental qualities you mention.

I can honestly say I visited only one stand where, if the vendor had said “I will here and now swap this aeroplane for your Foxbat” I would have said “yes” (and even then it would require some sober thought). That was the Carbon Cub stand – I would LOVE one of those but sadly they are twice the price of the Foxbat (at least).

[Andrew, I agree. I share my Tyabb hangar with Stephen Buckle, the Australian Cubcrafters agent, and have been able to fly a Carbon Cub several times. It’s a wonderful aircraft to fly but as you say, quite expensive.]

In your post you refer to a lot of individual features such as range, speed, load carrying capacity (which I think is one of the critical things) and so-on which inform a buying decision. We all go through this dissection analysis when forking out money for a plane but I wonder how much of it just rationalisation. Most of us buy an LSA for FUN.

What makes it fun ? For me the key things are:
1. Good visibility – if I am going to enjoy the sky and the view of the ground I want to see as much of it as I can.
2. The ability to get up high quickly – it makes me feel safe and see point 1 for the view.
3. The ability to fly low and slow safely – a lot of what I want to see is on the ground. That means a reliable engine and good low speed handling qualities.
4. Control harmony – it needs to feel nice to fly.
5. It has to look nice. Sounds odd but we spend far more time looking at our aeroplane from the outside than we do looking out of it from the inside. I don’t want an ugly aeroplane…no fun in that.

I think Yuriy and his team got the balance just right. At some point I want to buy a fast cross-country aeroplane and preferably one capable of mild aerobatics. That means probably an RV-7 or something like that – as I have a PPL I can go out of the LSA realm while my medical holds. When that time comes thiough, I REALLY hope I don’t have to sell the Foxbat (or at least not sell all of it) in order to afford the RV. That aeroplane will go more than 50% faster than the Foxbat so the speed does make a difference – distances beween flying friends can be large in WA.

[Again Andrew, I agree with the RV-7. I owned an RV-7A for a short while before someone made me an offer I couldn’t refuse. As a great handling, fast cruising aircraft – over 175 knots true at 7,500 feet – it takes a lot of beating. Foxbat owner Bo Hannington at Serpentine, WA, has that ideal combination – a Foxbat for his weekend pleasure flying and a quick RV-6 for cross-continent travel. Takes some beating.]

Sun ‘n Fun was awesome by the way – well worth the long trip. Friendly and diverse and no problem getting up close and personal with all kinds of aeroplanes. Among my favourites in the formal show were the twin Beech aerobatic display and the Aeroshell formation aerobatic team flying Harvards. The latter did a close formation (very close !) aerobatic display down to a couple of hundred feet – awesome in itself but get this: they then repeated it (a) at night (b) in and out of thick clouds of their own smoke (c) while trailing fireworks. Spine tingling but also incredibly beautiful and all to the sound track of those six radial engines. Some pics and videos on their Facebook page here:

https://www.facebook.com/AeroshellAerobaticTeam

Oh..and did I mention the jet assisted radial biplane? Something weird happens in the brain when that goes over the top sounding like a jet fighter!

Happy Flying!

Choosing a Light Sport Aircraft (LSA) – 5 – which one is best?

PilotWhen customers ask me about the Foxbat, the question I hear most is not ‘How fast?’, ‘How far?’ or ‘How much?’ but ‘What makes your Foxbat better than any other (or sometimes a specific) recreational/light sport aircraft?’ While I understand the reason for asking the question, it’s a bit like asking which is better: a pick-up/ute, a sports car or a sedan.

When I learned to fly – all those years ago – an aeroplane was pretty much an aeroplane – two wings (even back then, biplanes were often antiques), an engine at the front (anywhere else was considered a bit weird), and two seats, unless you were very very rich and could afford four. The Cessna 150 was the two seater of choice and the Cessna 172 the 4-seat family sedan of the air. And their Piper equivalents. There were specialist aerobatic aircraft and crop spraying aircraft but mostly the rest were all in much the same boat. If you don’t mind me mixing my mediums.

Over the intervening years, ultralights and light sport aircraft have come along and diversified the market beyond all expectation. I remember when you could get just plain salted, cheese & onion, or salt & vinegar crisps (chips to our USA friends). Now look at the amazing choice available. Same goes for yoghurt. Same goes for aeroplanes….

So what’s the ‘best’ aeroplane for you?

Evening flightMany people just want an aircraft to fly for leisure – mostly at weekends, sometimes on summer mornings/evenings and very occasionally for a longer trip to a fly-in or some similar event. They want something that’s at least pleasant, even beautiful, to their eyes and fits their wallet. A lot of first-time buyers are relatively low-time pilots, so the handling characteristics and feel of the aircraft are often less important to them than looks, cruise speed or comfort. Or, occasionally, short take off and landing performance. Realistically, their choice is perhaps the simplest – does it look good (to them) and can they afford it?

It’s when you start selecting essential qualities that the decision becomes more difficult.

Flying tractorFor example – a farmer/landowner wants a strong landing gear and good safe slow speed handling so they can take-off and land in small spaces on unprepared paddocks. Outright top speed is likely not a key decider. The aircraft needs to be robust and reliable, because it’s going to be used a lot, and down-time is potentially lost money. And it probably needs to be easy and safe to fly near to the ground. And quick and easy to fix if it breaks down or gets broken.

These same characteristics also apply in large measure to flying school aircraft – ideally they need to be easy to fly and land, with robust landing gear. That way, the chances of an incident that results in damage are minimised. If the aircraft does get bent, they need it fixed quickly or it’s losing money rapidly, so parts availability is crucial.

WookieAnother example: if you are a big person, you’ll need to be able to fit into the cabin – it’s a good job the Millennium Falcon had a roomy flight deck! And if you are heavy, you’ll need an aircraft that can carry you, a reasonable amount of fuel and probably a passenger. There are light sport aircraft on the market that can legally carry less than 200 kilos – that’s everything: pilot, passenger, baggage and fuel. Put two 90 kilo people on board, no bags, and that leaves you 20 kilos for fuel – about 28 litres, which will last about 75 minutes.

fast-spacecraftThen there are the speed freaks – as long as they can say it goes faster than yours, it’s the one for them. But to go fast in an aeroplane demands compromises – smaller cabins, so there’s less drag; landings are potentially faster, longer and trickier; and the airframe has to be stronger (read: heavier) to cope with rough air at higher speeds…reducing the load carrying capacity. As one famous old American flying ace commented: ‘Unless you’re going at least 50% faster than the others, after a very short time you won’t notice any difference’. And next month someone else will buy one just a bit faster.

By now, you’re probably starting to realise (if you hadn’t already) that all aircraft are a compromise and are designed according to a set of requirements decided by the manufacturer. As with all types of vehicle, there’s no such thing as ‘all things to all people’.

EindeckerSo an important thing to think about, when deciding which aircraft, is what’s best for you – and be realistic! How often will you really fly it? Will you usually take a passenger with you or fly alone? How far will you really go on a typical flight? Are you really going to fly round Australia in it, one day? Will the aircraft really carry the weight you need it to? Why is speed important? Is getting there 10 minutes quicker, probably using more fuel, really that important?

There are no simple answers. For me – and I emphasise me – the A22 Foxbat does what I want: takes off and lands slowly in short distances, has a fantastic view out, uses the ever reliable Rotax 912 engine and is safe and easy to fly. It has a big roomy cabin and legally carries a big load. It’s not the fastest flier in its class but I can live with getting there a few minutes later, which is outweighed (for me) by all the other pro’s.

Choosing a Light Sport Aircraft (LSA) – 4 – secondary safety

Cockpit safetyNext, secondary safety. This ranges from the simple – eg how many bits stick out in the cabin to injure you during anything, from just getting into the aircraft, to a full-blown crash – to the complex – how the airframe will protect you (or not) if you hit something or end up inverted in a field.

 

 

At a basic level, have a look at:

– how close are your legs to the instrument panel and other parts of the airframe?
– How close is your head to the canopy or roof? Sudden turbulence could potentially give you a nasty bump!
– How the seatbelt is fixed to the airframe and whether it has one or two shoulder straps (or even a crotch strap – usually only in aerobatic aircraft).
– Whether you can easily pinch your fingers under levers and other controls. Could be a dangerous distraction if it happens at a crucial time, like taking off or landing.
– Whether there’s suitable padding in likely areas of head or knee contact.
– Could you sit there for 2-3 hours without aches, pains and cramps?

At the next level, consider:
– how easy is it to exit the aircraft in an emergency? For example, if there’s an engine fire on the ground.
– Could you get out if the aircraft was inverted on the ground?
– Is there plenty of room to move in the cabin?

Small aeroplane big manIn particular:
– Can the controls be moved fully and freely to their limits without having to move your (or your passenger’s) legs out of the way?
– Can you push full rudder deflection? Both left and right?
– Can you see out properly? How difficult is it to see the runway in front when you’re on the ground?
– Do you have to duck to see under (or over) the wing while flying? You’ll soon get a crick in the neck if if it’s a pain to look and you might do it less often than you should.
– Is it easy to knock the controls inadvertently – particularly the throttle and the elevator and/or aileron trim?
– Does the aircraft have an isolating switch to cut all electrical power in an emergency?
– Is there a park brake to facilitate engine warm up and ignition checks? In some aircraft it is virtually impossible to hold the brakes on, hold the flight controls, use the throttle and check the ignition all at the same time.

Safety cageFinally – and usually more difficult – try to find out:
– Is there a safety cage or roll-over hoop round the cabin ? This will help protect you and your passenger in an impact and also help keep the doors (or canopy) from jamming shut, trapping you inside.
– What is the safety record of the aircraft? What percentage have injured people or worse?
– Can it be fitted with a ballistic rescue parachute?

 

The last word about secondary safety concerns the material the airframe is built from. There are three main types – metal, wood and composite.

Metal wing bendMetal is well known to have excellent impact absorbing qualities; initially it bends rather than breaks and structures can be designed to reduce the G-forces acting during a crash. A common reaction from people who’ve experienced an accident in a metal airframe aircraft is ‘it all seemed so gentle, I just couldn’t believe the aircraft was a write off when I got out and looked at it’. That’s because the airframe did its job. However, if there’s corrosion in the airframe, it may not do its protecting job properly.

Wooden wingWood is used much less in LSAs nowadays, although at least one of the most famous World War Two aircraft – the De Havilland Mosquito – had a wooden airframe. A well designed and built wooden aircraft should have good impact absorption although in some higher energy crashes, wood will break suddenly as it doesn’t bend as much as metal. It also depends how much of the airframe is glued, pegged or screwed together – believe it or not, a well-glued wooden airframe is stronger than one screwed together.

CComposite wing damageomposites are used extensively in LSAs. Some manufacturers will tell you their aircraft are ‘carbon fibre’ but in most cases – because of the sheer expense – this is used very sparingly only in high-stress areas. Most composite aircraft are mainly or wholly some sort of glass-fibre. As boat builders will tell you, getting consistent results when manufacturing with glass-fibre is a notoriously difficult process. As a result, the empty weights of the same model of LSA can vary substantially (see Choosing a Light Sport Aircraft (LSA) – 1 – what about weight?). Also, to ensure sufficient strength, manufacturers tend to err on the side of too much rather than too little. The crash characteristics of composite airframes are quite different from metal or wood – composites do not bend much at all. Their ultimate breaking strength is often higher than metal or wood, but when they do break, they tend to shatter into small, often sharp pieces. Another problem with composites is water getting into the (sometimes foam-filled) structure through minor dings and cracks – good reason to make sure any puncture in the skin is fixed immediately.

Seatbelt airbagRecent developments in light aircraft safety have seen the appearance of ‘inflatable restraint systems’ – or seatbelt air bags. As far as I am aware, these are not yet offered as standard on any LSAs but no doubt the time is coming. At US$1,000-1,500 per seat, they are probably worth considering. A ballistic rescue system for an LSA costs in the region of A$6,000, so seat belt inflation systems could represent (expense-wise) a half-way house.

 

In summary, when choosing an LSA, only you can decide which safety features are important for you. I know some pilots who won’t fly an aircraft unless it has a ballistic rescue system. Others work on an ‘it will never happen to me’ basis. In between these extremes, weigh up the primary and secondary safety elements and give them a weighting that’s important to you. That way, at least you’ll choose an aircraft that you know is right for you.

Airliner graveyard

Airliner graveyardHere’s a short video (in case you haven’t seen it) about the last flight of a Qantas Boeing 767, VH-OGG, where it has been mothballed in the Mojave Desert.

The all-female crew flew the aircraft from Sydney to California with just one passenger on board – the reporter.

As usual, click on the picture to link you to the video.