Event reminder – AAAA annual fly-in at Echuca

AAAA Echuca 2015If you’re an old aeroplane enthusiast, here’s your once-a-year chance to see dozens of them all in one place – Echuca Airport, on the Murray River, north Victoria, on Saturday 28 March.

The Antique Aeroplane Association of Australia – AAAA – is holding their 39th National Fly-in over 27-29 March 2015.  Aircraft will start arriving on Friday 27th and departing on Sunday morning, 29th. In between, Saturday should see a wonderful array of old flying beasts on the flight line (as well as their aircraft!).

On Saturday evening, AAAA is holding its annual dinner at the Moama Bowls Club across the river – tickets will be on sale on Friday and Saturday.

The last time this event was held at Echuca in 2011, I flew up from Tyabb in a SportStar with Mike Rudd, who made a couple of great videos about the show. You can click here for part 1 and here for part 2.

Apart from the flying, Echuca is a great place to visit at this time of year, with paddle steamer trips on the Murray River as well as a great selection of cafes, shops and restaurants. Echuca is under a 3-hour drive from Melbourne, and less from Albury-Wodonga, Wagga Wagga, Bendigo and the like, so even if you can’t fly-in, the location makes it a reasonable day-trip.

Fingers crossed for good weather and I’ll be taking the Interstate Cadet to join the festivities. Hope to see you there!

SportStar flight test – comparison with Foxbat

SportStarHere’s a completely unsolicited flight report on an Evektor SportStar with references to the Foxbat. The flights were conducted early this year at Jandakot Airport, Perth by ‘Birdseye’ and posted on the Recreational Flying Forums – thanks to him for the review.

 

“Well after a visit to look over the Sportstar a week or so ago, I went for a first ride today. A big plus that the BoM advance forecast of 39C and sunny was crap and the day turned out around low thirties, overcast with light winds and smooth air. Who could ask for more when trying a new ride for the first time? Not only that, but WA’s busiest airfield was more like a morgue than a honeypot.

First impressions on taxying out were reminiscent of the Foxbat; same firm rudder. However, without the doughnut golf buggy tyres and variable ground surfaces, it wasn’t at all bad. Then again on similar surfaces the Foxbat may have felt the same. Instantly the low wing visibility made me feel more comfortable, probably due to my earlier power and later glider flying. Had the sun been blazing down, I might have liked the Foxbat more, but the neat sunshade was available in the Sportstar if required.

All the engine management stuff, run up etc. was quite natural. l liked the fuel selector which was reminiscent of the Cherokee. Still some venting issues to consider in its operation, but nice and easy to hand. Panel was close to the trad six pack which I loved and lay out was clear and switches/controls were easy to hand. I’m by no means a luddite and in fact many class me a a techno and lover of gadgets, but I don’t easily relate to the low end glass screens that seem to be the vogue. I’ve used high end EFIS/HSI setups and like them, but these pretty terrain projections etc. really do turn me off due to their ability to distract. Just Too much encouragement to young players to look inside the cockpit. TCAS is great, but not for VFR flyers to rely upon.

The flying? Well I enjoyed the conventionally placed stick and other controls. The electric trim responded quickly and I didn’t spend so much time waiting for it to catch up. The down side? It happened quicker than expected, but I don’t see that as an issue. Otherwise the aeroplane was nicely balanced, easy to trim and gave good performance on its 912 ULS motor. Once practicing steeper turns the low wing massaged my comfort zone; a clear view into the turn gave me confidence that a high wing doesn’t. Just personal preference? Maybe, but its something I felt many years ago switching between a Beagle Pup (say ahhhhhh, a lovely plane in fact much like the Sportstar) and a C150.

Forward visibility was rather better, to the point where I had to check myself from drifting up due to the angle presented by the panel. On climb out only a small nudge was needed to check for a clear path ahead.

So, how does somebody write something like this without upsetting somebody? Maybe not compare directly, just focus on the strengths of each? It would be nice to try a broader range of modern LSA aircraft, but with the incredible range that’s just not practicable. My summary is that both the Foxbat and Sportstar are great aeroplanes, with small differences in their purpose and hence varied attraction to pilots. The Foxbat will get you down on a proverbial fag paper and nobody should ever fear a forced landing in one. Its a little unconventional in areas, that some, including myself may have a problem with. Most will I’m sure be more than happy.

The Sportstar is another well built aeroplane, that will perform at the low end close to the Foxbat, possibly without the pin point short field performance. It suits more what I intend to use the aeroplane for and to me is better for no more than that.  10/10 for both!”

A22LS Foxbat service advisory notice – urgent!

A22LS cardan ring crackSome cracks have recently been found in the Cardan rings on an Australian operated A22LS Foxbat. Although there have been no other reports of similar cracks in the worldwide fleet, because it affects part of the primary flight control system, the factory will be issuing a mandatory inspection requirement and an amendment to the Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM). RA-Aus and CASA have been informed.

There are two Cardan rings on the aircraft – these are a type of universal joint – connecting the flaperon control torque tube and the flaperon. They are located just outside the fuselage where the control tube exits the cabin at the rear of the wing – see picture above (click photo for a bigger version).

The cracking is caused by over-tightening the long vertical connecting bolt, possibly made worse by allowing the control surfaces to bang up and down in the wind when the aircraft is parked outside with the controls unrestrained.

Here’s what you need to do BEFORE THE NEXT FLIGHT:

– lower the flaps to their full extent;
– remove the safety pin and loosen and remove the long bolt which runs vertically through the Cardan ring;
– inspect top and bottom lugs of the ring for any cracks;
– if no cracks are found, lubricate and replace the bolt and tighten to 2Nm of torque; don’t forget to replace the safety pin!
– if cracks are found, please contact me at Foxbat Australia on info@foxbat.com.au with clear, in focus pictures of the cracks.

On completion of the inspection, either (a) if no problems are found, record a statement to that effect in the aircraft maintenance log, or (b) if cracks are found, complete an RA-Aus incident report (click this link to get to the form on the RA-Aus website) and send it to the RA-Aus National safety Manager.

If you have any questions about this advisory, please call me, Peter, on 0413 900 892.

No greater burden

No greater burdenMore about flying safely: here is a moving and important video from AOPA about the consequences of, and lessons from, an aircraft accident which led to the death of the pilot’s son.

The accident resulted from a relatively simple mistake made by an experienced pilot, which clearly had devastating consequences. Although over 30 minutes long, I think the video should be mandatory viewing for all pilots, however experienced.

After the video, have a look at the points score for the Stress Scale – it’s interesting to see that it isn’t only negatives which affect your judgement.

Apart from all the psychological factors, I know of several pilots who have individually commented that physical factors such as dehydration, very early (03.30) rising with a full day’s activity, long gaps between meals or flying into the sun for long periods, all resulted in ragged landings towards the end of the day. Thankfully, aircraft were not damaged and no-one was injured but all have learned these basic lessons for future application.

Fly safely.

 

Rotax engines (3) waterless coolant

Rotax 2013 cylinder headsIn 2013, Rotax introduced (without much of a fanfare) a new design of cylinder head for their 912 carburettor series engines. These cylinder heads have been fitted to all new engines since then and may be retrofitted to earlier engines.

Having received a couple of queries from owners whose engines incorporate the new heads, it is important to understand that you cannot use waterless coolant in conjunction with these heads.

In addition it’s worth noting the following:
– the new heads are similar to but not the same as those fitted to the 912iS fuel injection engine. If you have to replace cylinder heads, make sure you get the right ones.
– the CHT sensor is in a new location
– what was the CHT sensor now measures coolant temperature not cylinder head temperature. You therefore have to use a new coloured-arc temperature gauge to reflect the correct coolant (not CHT) temperature limits.
– the sensor screw must be sealed with Loctite as the sensor is now immersed in coolant; the earlier CHT probe fitted into a dry void in the cylinder head.
– the cylinder head bolts must be torqued to a different value from the old ones, and also in a different order.

You can access detailed information about these cylinder heads in at least three places:
(a) Rotax Service instruction SI-912-020
(b) Rotax Line Maintenance Manual temporary update
(c) ‘Rotax Minute’ video, which briefly describes to differences between old and new design cylinder heads (may be Rotax can change that awful voice over??)

 

Rotax engines (2) carburettor floats

Rotax carby floatsAt last Rotax has issued a final service bulletin covering replacement carburettor floats. For those not fully up to speed on this, Rotax has had a problem with ‘permeable’ carburettor floats on most recent 912 series engines. Basically any faulty floats absorb fuel and sink to the bottom of the float chamber, causing rough running and potentially overflowing fuel. Floats on affected engines had to be checked every 25 hours and if needed, replaced.

The latest service bulletins (click on the numbers to see & download): SB-912-067 and SB-912-067UL list the affected engine numbers and necessary actions.

In addition, Rotax has posted information on their blog about how to get your replacement floats.

In Australia, contact Bert Flood Imports – phone 03 9735 5655 – near Melbourne, give/send them your engine number, and they will send you replacement floats and an invoice for them. Returning the old floats quickly together with the invoice will result in a refund/credit or cancellation of the invoice.

Hopefully this will see a conclusion to the concerns over faulty floats.

Rotax engines (1) scheduled service intervals

Rotax serviceOn what basis do you record your times for scheduled services on your Rotax engine? Engine running hours – start to stop? Starting to taxi to stopping – wheels turning to wheels stopping? Flight time via an air switch – wheels off to wheels on the runway?

At bigger and/or busier airfields there could easily be a big cumulative difference between engine start/stop and wheels off to wheels on the runway – as much a 25% or more by some LAME accounts. So what is the correct procedure for recording times to determine scheduled maintenance on your Rotax engine? The answer, it seems, has been about as clear as year-old engine oil!

The initial response from the Rotax service department to my query was that maintenance must be carried out based on engine running time as recorded by ‘an electronic engine hours timer’ – ie start-up to shut-down. This is different to some of the statements in their maintenance manuals and certainly not the way most flight schools and clubs record time for engine servicing; they usually use take-off to landing times for overhaul.

Please note:
What follows has now been superseded by the following: all Rotax engine scheduled maintenance times are currently based on engine running times – ie from start up to shut down. Therefore, for maintenance purposes, record engine running times accordingly. Also check to ensure that the airframe manufacturer aligns their mandatory maintenance schedules with the engine maintenance requirements. Most of them do – including Aeroprakt.

Please also see my updated blog post on scheduled maintenance times: https://foxbatpilot.com/2017/04/12/rotax-engines-4-scheduled-maintenance-update/

When questioned a little more, Rotax finally clarified that their engine scheduled maintenance times comply with standard FAA (and CASA) practice – that is, take-off to landing time, ideally measured with an air-switch hours meter. I now have this in writing (by email) from them, so if you or your engineer need written confirmation, let me know.

So, repeating, for the sake of avoiding all doubt – record your engine scheduled maintenance times from take-off to landing. Maybe even fit an air-switch-operated hours counter if you need to. In the long run, this can save you quite a lot when it comes to servicing, likely well more than the cost of fitting an air-switch.

PS – Don’t forget: if you are late with a service – eg 55 hours instead of 50, the next service is still due at 100 hours, not 105. Read the Rotax manuals!

Foxy ladies carry the baton!

Foxy Ladies hand over the baton in Bundaberg L-R Nathalie, Danielle and Heather

Foxy Ladies hand over the baton in Bundaberg
L-R Nathalie, Danielle and Heather

As mentioned in a previous post, on Sunday 8 March, Heather and Nathalie carried the baton from Caboolture to Bundaberg for the Women Pilot’s Relay of Flight in support of the Australia Cancer Council.

Originally hoping to raise $1,500, in the end Heather and Nathalie managed over $3,600!! What a fantastic effort and congratulations to all donators and helpers alike.

Good on you Foxy Ladies!

PS – You can still donate to the cause – click here to take you to the Foxy Ladies fund raising page at the Cancer Council website

10 Flying quotes that could save your life

10 Quotes to save your lifeA few old nuggets here which are well worth repeating – whether you’re a new, inexperienced, experienced or gnarly old 20,000 hour  pilot.

I’d add: 3 things which are useless to pilots – runway behind you, air above you and fuel when you’re on fire…fly safely!

PS – Click here or on the image for more information.

Avalon Airshow wrap

Avalon 2015 02Well, the 2015 Australian International Airshow, subtitled ‘Heroes of the Sky’ has come and gone.

As usual, the trade days – Tuesday to Thursday and Friday morning, were dominated by suits and uniforms, as the heavy end of town came to look at, marvel and maybe even buy some of the amazing hardware on offer. The weather was reasonably co-operative and Word War One monoplanes, biplanes and triplanes carried out mock dog fights followed by modern day big noisy fighter jets, afterburners lit up and dropping decoy flares as they climbed vertically through the cloud base.

On the ground, the static aircraft numbers steadily built during the week as more exhibitors and organisations arrived for the public days – Friday afternoon, Saturday and Sunday. On one of the trade days, while things were quiet, I had a chance to wander round the three big display ‘halls’ – huge marquees joined together with coffee shops and cafes – and the outside static exhibits.

This year’s show seemed quite a contrast with the last one, in 2013, in that here seemed to be far fewer civil and military drones on display this time round. They were there of course but last time they seemed to be everywhere you looked – small ones with less than a metre wingspan/diameter, right up to the huge US Airforce drone with a wingspan longer than a Boeing 737, which this year was flown in (remotely of course) from Guam. Maybe drones have gone top-secret or perhaps most of the wannabe’s couldn’t be, and only a few remain in business?

There was a thin sprinkling of Light Sport Aircraft – Tecnam, Sling, Brumby, Evektor, Flight Design and Foxbat, plus a few other specialists like powered parachutes. But most of the Recreational and Light Sport importers/manufacturers stayed away….as there is no ‘NATFLY’ this year, I’d expected to see many of them with a static display – the price to put a couple of aircraft at Avalon isn’t so different from NATFLY and certainly a lot less than the cost of an advert in some of the flying magazines.

At Foxbat Australia, we had a static display of three aircraft – all co-incidentally yellow – quite close to the main entrance. This year the usual questions: ‘how much?’, ‘how fast?’, ‘how high?’ and ‘what’s the engine?’, were supplemented with ‘can you get another colour than yellow?’ Apart from the quiet trade days, I’d say the attendance was up on 2013, particularly on the Saturday, when I and my helpers were kept busy with visitors who genuinely seemed to be looking to buy. The proof of the Avalon sales pudding is usually over the 6 months following, when people have had the chance to reflect, research, fly and decide.

Many thanks to owners Chris Plumstead and Bob Medwell for loaning their aircraft for display; and Mike Rudd and Rob Goodman for ferrying them into and out of a busy Avalon. Thanks also to Soar Aviation for adding one of their school aircraft to the display and to Koushik and Damien (both Soar instructors) for ferry duties.

There is already an amazing number of Avalon 2015 videos on YouTube, one or two of which are reasonably well produced including a short clip from Black Sheep Productions, but many of which are either too long and boring or badly shot and edited – or both.

Fox Formation2Finally, this picture was taken by Mike Rudd (in a Foxbat) on the way back from Avalon to Tyabb. The formation Foxbats are being flown by two experienced formation-endorsed pilots – Rob Goodman and Damien Nott – as they crossed Port Philip Bay in the evening sun.

As usual, click on the photo for a bigger version.